🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are secure and fit for children," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the state level due to federal gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Outside of these regions, other nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of this nation and others indicate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.